Doctor Of Traditional Chinese Medicine

The Director denied the petition because the petitioner did not meet the initial evidence requirements of satisfying at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. The AAO found the petitioner met three criteria: (iv) participation as a judge of the work of others; (v) original contributions of major significance, evidenced by a patented methodology for administering Botox in the Russian Federation, described by medical practitioners and advertised by clinics; and (viii) performance in a leading or critical role for distinguished organizations, demonstrated by her long-standing role as a consultant, adviser, mentor, and trainer for a Botox/Juvederm manufacturer, and as a main speaker for a major brand in Russia, significantly contributing to sales and reputation.

The Petitioner satisfied the minimum three criteria required for EB-1A classification. The Director's initial finding that she lacked intent to work in the field was overturned due to a prospective job offer from a U.S. medical school. The case was remanded for a final merits determination to evaluate whether the Petitioner has sustained national or international acclaim.