dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Television Producer

Television Producer · Kazakhstan · 2024-06-11

Decision Date
2024-06-11
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

0 of 3 criteria met
Membership in associations that require outstanding achievements (Not Met)

Membership in the Union of Journalists of the Republic of Kazakhstan was obtained in 2021, after the 2020 filing date, and did not require outstanding achievements.

Published material about the Petitioner (Not Met)

The KazUnite article was published in 2022, post-filing, and the record lacked circulation data to establish it as a major medium.

Participation as a judge of the work of others (Not Met)

The judging invitation was for an event in 2022, which does not establish eligibility at the time of the 2020 filing.

Original contributions of major significance (Not Met)

While the Petitioner made original contributions valued by her employers, there was no evidence they were of major significance to the field at large.

Display of the Petitioner's work at artistic exhibitions (Not Met)

The Petitioner failed to address this criterion in response to the second RFE and raised specific arguments for it only on appeal.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner did not satisfy at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. Key deficiencies included evidence dated after the petition filing (2020), lack of certified translations for instructional materials, and failure to demonstrate that original contributions were of major significance to the field as a whole.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFEs requested evidence of eligibility for the claimed criteria; the Petitioner responded with materials that largely post-dated the filing or lacked required translations and circulation data.

RFE Targets
Membership in associations that require outstanding achievementsPublished material about the PetitionerParticipation as a judge of the work of othersOriginal contributions of major significanceDisplay of the Petitioner's work at artistic exhibitions

Evidence

Evidence Types
Media Coverage
Professional Memberships
Judging Experience
Original Contributions
Reference Letters Dependent
Evidence Submitted
  • Membership in the Union of Journalists of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2021)
  • Interview in KazUnite (2022)
  • Judging panel for a competition (2022)
  • Recommendation letter from a production studio head
  • Ministry of Information and Public Development list of approved channels
  • Video tutorials used as instructional material at a university

Similar Cases

Director

Entertainment · Turkey

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-08-14
The AAO found that the Director erred in evaluating the evidence for original contributions and leading/critical roles. The Petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance by co-founding and serving as Vice-Chairman for an organization that successfully advocated for union rights for advertising professionals in Turkey, leading to the incorporation of the 'Advertising Professionals Union' into the 'Turkish Cinema and Broadcasting Union'. This effort addressed substandard working conditions and highlighted advertisers' $120 billion annual contribution to Turkey's economy. The Petitioner also demonstrated leading/critical roles as Head of Production for an internationally known advertising agency, successfully leading campaigns for clients like Netflix, which garnered multiple awards (e.g., Best Social Media Campaign, Best Digital Art Direction, Best Branded Film Content). Another campaign for Amnesty International, highlighting imprisoned journalists, generated over 1.2 million impressions and reached 3 million people in Turkey, winning a Golden Drum award.

Others

Entertainment

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-09-25
The AAO remanded the case because the Director's decision lacked sufficient analysis and discussion of the evidence, reaching conclusory findings without proper explanation. Specifically, the Director failed to adequately address all claimed evidentiary criteria, improperly dismissed evidence due to perceived translation certification issues without explaining the problem, and incorrectly stated that employment verification letters were not provided. The decision did not fully explain the reasons for denial, hindering a fair appeal and meaningful appellate review.

Marketing Manager

Entertainment · Venezuela

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2025-03-25
The Petitioner failed to meet any of the ten EB-1A criteria. While she received awards, they lacked evidence of national or international recognition; her memberships did not require outstanding achievements; and her published materials were not shown to be in major media. Although she performed a critical role for her employer, the organization was not proven to have a distinguished reputation.

Director

Entertainment · Brazil

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
Florida 2024-11-18
The Director found only one criterion met (published material about himself and his work). The AAO concluded the Petitioner did not meet criteria for original contributions of major significance, performing in a leading or critical role for distinguished organizations, or commercial successes in the performing arts. Evidence did not show major significance of contributions, the company's distinguished reputation, or commercial success through sales volumes or box office receipts. The record did not demonstrate the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-06-11.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 5

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist