dismissed EB-1A

Speed Skater

Speed Skater · Poland · 2025-03-17

Decision Date
2025-03-17
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

0 of 3 criteria met
Prizes or Awards (Not Met)

The Petitioner submitted photos of medals without translations and letters that lacked detail regarding the criteria for excellence or national significance of the awards.

Memberships (Not Met)

While membership on the national team was confirmed, the record did not establish that the team requires 'outstanding achievements' as judged by recognized experts.

Published Material (Not Met)

The criterion was claimed but not reached in the final analysis as the petitioner failed the first two criteria, making the appeal dispositive.

Artistic Exhibition or Showcases (Not Met)

The criterion was claimed but not reached in the final analysis as the petitioner failed the first two criteria.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner did not satisfy at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. Specifically, the awards criterion was not met due to lack of translations and details on competition significance, and the membership criterion was not met because the entry standards for the national team were not sufficiently defined as requiring 'outstanding achievements.'

Evidence

Evidence Types
Awards
Professional Memberships
Media Coverage
Evidence Submitted
  • Placements in 2013, 2015, 2018, and 2019 competitions
  • Membership on the Polish national speed skating team
  • Letters from the Sport Director of the Association
  • News articles regarding race times and points
  • Photos of medals and trophies (untranslated)

Similar Cases

Coach

Sports

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2025-02-26
The AAO withdrew the Director's decision and remanded the matter because the Director failed to provide a complete analysis and sufficient basis for denial. Specifically, the Director did not discuss or analyze evidence submitted for criteria (iii), (v), and (ix), comparable evidence, or fully evaluate evidence for criteria (i) and (viii). The Director also made factual errors regarding the Petitioner's occupation and RFE dates.

Coach

Sports · Russia

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2023-06-15
The Petitioner only satisfied one criterion (judging). The membership in the regional Figure Skating Federation did not require 'outstanding achievements' as judged by national/international experts, and the article on championat.com was deemed a popular article for a general readership rather than a scholarly article for learned persons. Additionally, the television appearance on Russia 1 was about children learning to skate rather than a substantial discussion of the Petitioner's own work.

Others

Sports

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-03-13
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner met zero of the required three criteria. Specifically, evidence for awards (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)) lacked context on significance, and membership evidence (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ii)) failed to prove the 'outstanding achievements' requirement for the National Snowboarding Team. Other claimed criteria (published material and judging) were not reached as the first two were dispositive.

Others

Sports · Venezuela

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-09-12
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the minimum requirement of satisfying at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. While the AAO found the Petitioner met the 'lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards' criterion and the Director found the 'published materials' criterion met, the 'memberships' and 'leading or critical role' criteria were not satisfied. The record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner was among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-03-17.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 3

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist