dismissed EB-1A

Security Manager And Fitness Trainer

Security Manager And Fitness Trainer · Kazakhstan · 2024-09-30

Decision Date
2024-09-30
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

1 of 3 criteria met
Participation as a judge of the work of others (Met)

The Petitioner served as one of nine judges at the [name] in 2014, evaluating athletes based on specific criteria, which meets this criterion.

Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards (Not Met)

The Petitioner's 'Diploma' and 'Letter of Appreciation' were not demonstrated to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, lacking evidence of significance beyond employer/military unit recognition or media coverage.

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements (Not Met)

Membership in the Kazakhstan Federation of Boxing (KFB) and the Oidene Hand-to-Hand Combat Federation (OHCF) did not establish that admission requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.

Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance (Not Met)

The 'Methodological Manual for Hand-to-Hand Fighting' and coaching accomplishments were not shown to have major significance or substantial influence beyond the Petitioner's immediate organization, instructors, coaches, and students.

Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases (Not Met)

The Petitioner's master class instruction in fighting skills was not considered a display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases, as the field is not in the arts.

Performance in a leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation (Not Met)

The Petitioner failed to present evidence demonstrating that the Oidene Hand-to-Hand Combat Federation (OHCF), Ministry of Internal Affairs, and State Security Service of the Republic of Kazakhstan have a distinguished reputation.

High salary or other significantly high remuneration (Not Met)

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding that he did not meet the high salary criterion.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility for extraordinary ability. The AAO found the Petitioner only met one of the ten regulatory criteria (judging) and did not establish the required three criteria. Specifically, the Petitioner's 'Diploma' and 'Letter of Appreciation' were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized awards. Memberships in the Kazakhstan Federation of Boxing (KFB) and the Oidene Hand-to-Hand Combat Federation (OHCF) did not require outstanding achievements judged by experts. Original contributions, such as the 'Methodological Manual for Hand-to-Hand Fighting,' were not shown to be of major significance beyond the Petitioner's immediate sphere. The master class instruction was not considered an artistic exhibition, and the organizations for which the Petitioner claimed a leading role (OHCF, Ministry of Internal Affairs, State Security Service of the Republic of Kazakhstan) were not proven to have a distinguished reputation. The Petitioner also did not contest the Director's finding that he did not meet the high salary criterion.

Evidence

Evidence Types
Awards
Professional Memberships
Judging Experience
Original Contributions
Reference Letters Dependent
Leading Role
High Salary
Exhibitions
Evidence Submitted
  • 2021 \Diploma\ from the [name] for achievements in work and impeccable service in the Internal Affairs Bodies
  • \Letter of Appreciation\ addressed to parents from the \Commander of [name]\ for fulfilling military duty
  • Membership with the Kazakhstan Federation of Boxing (KFB)
  • Membership with the Oidene Hand-to-Hand Combat Federation (OHCF)
  • Letter from [name] stating Petitioner served as one of nine judges at the [name] in 2014
  • Letters of support from colleagues
  • Document entitled \Methodological Manual for Hand-to-Hand Fighting [name]\

Similar Cases

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-09-30
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary requirements for extraordinary ability, specifically not demonstrating a major internationally recognized award or satisfying at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. The AAO found the Petitioner did not meet criteria for lesser awards (regional student bodybuilding, institutional conference presentations), original contributions of major significance (methodology not widely adopted beyond clients, medical applications lacked credibility), artistic exhibitions (bodybuilding competitions not artistic, presentations not comparable), or leading/critical role (brand ambassador role lacked quantified impact, university role lacked detail and impact evidence, organizations not shown to have distinguished reputation). No specific metrics were provided for met criteria as none were found to be met.

Coach

Sports · Brazil

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
Texas 2024-06-21
The Petitioner satisfied only two criteria: judging and leading/critical role. He failed the awards criterion because the Centenary Medal was received after the filing date and other medals lacked evidence of being awarded to him personally. The original contributions criterion was not met as there was insufficient evidence that his teaching methodology had a major impact on the field beyond his own organization.

Athlete

Sports · Kyrgyzstan

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-08-02
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for extraordinary ability by not meeting at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. Specifically, the AAO withdrew the Director's finding that the judging criterion was met, citing insufficient evidence regarding the nature and level of judging activities. The published material criterion was also not met due to outdated viewership statistics for the media outlet and the author not being identified. The awards criterion was not addressed as it would not change the outcome, and the membership criterion was met but insufficient on its own.
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-12-12
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that she met at least three of the ten regulatory criteria for extraordinary ability. Specifically, the Petitioner's work-related training certificates and employer-issued 'Employee of the Year' and 'Employee Referral Award' were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized. Her role in selecting models for fashion shows was not considered judging the work of others. Her contributions, such as curating product collections and developing sales techniques, lacked evidence of major significance to the overall field. Her senior sales representative role was not proven to be leading or critical for a distinguished organization, and her salary evidence was deemed insufficient as it included post-filing data and lacked relevant comparative salary ranges.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-09-30.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 1 / 3
Evidence Types 8

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 883
Success Rate 52.8%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 300

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist