How common are denied EB-1A petitions?

EB-1A petition outcomes vary based on the strength of evidence, the specific criteria addressed, and the adjudicating officer. Each case is evaluated individually based on its own merits and documentation.

How does the sciences industry affect EB-1A petition outcomes?

The sciences sector has unique considerations for EB-1A petitions. USCIS evaluates whether the petitioner's qualifications and contributions align with the specific requirements of the visa category. Industry context matters for demonstrating the significance and impact of the petitioner's work.

dismissed EB-1A

Associate Vice President, Head Of Analytics And Data Science

Sciences · 2024-08-20

Decision Date

2024-08-20

This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

3 of 3 criteria met

Participating as a judge of the work of others (Met)

The Director concluded this criterion was met. The AAO acknowledged the Petitioner participated as a judge in 2023, but noted it was limited to a short period and did not demonstrate sustained acclaim.

Authorship of scholarly articles in major media (Met)

The AAO found this criterion met, concluding that the Petitioner authored more than one non-academic scholarly article for learned persons in the field, and these were published by professional or major trade publications. However, the articles were all published in 2023, lacking sustainment.

Leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation (Met)

The Director concluded this criterion was met. The AAO acknowledged the Petitioner's leading role as 'Associate Vice President, Head of Analytics and Data Science' from August 2021 to March 2023, but noted the limited duration did not demonstrate sustained acclaim.

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements (Not Met)

The memberships in BCS and IEEE were not accepted because the record did not establish that these associations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts, despite the Petitioner's assertions of synonymous language and internal expert selection processes.

High salary or other significantly high remuneration (Not Met)

The criterion was not met because the Petitioner's salary, while at the higher end for general data analysts, was not adequately compared to top-level Data Analytics Leaders or executive leadership in information technology companies with comparable experience and responsibilities, which was deemed the relevant comparison group.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because, despite the Petitioner satisfying three initial criteria (judging, scholarly articles, and leading role), the evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. The activities cited, such as judging, authoring articles, and holding a leading role, were primarily limited to a short period (2021-2023, mostly 2023) immediately preceding the petition filing in 2023, failing to show a 'career of acclaimed work.' Additionally, memberships in BCS and IEEE were not deemed to require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts, and the high salary claim lacked comparison to top-level peers with similar experience and responsibilities.

Evidence

Evidence Types

Professional Memberships

Scholarly Articles

Judging Experience

Leading Role

High Salary

Evidence Submitted

Membership as 'fellow member' of the British Computer Society (BCS)
Membership as 'senior member' of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Authorship of three non-academic scholarly articles posted online by differing web portals in 2023
Participation as a judge of the work of others in 2023
Performed a leading or critical role as 'Associate Vice President, Head of Analytics and Data Science' for a consumer technology company between August 2021 and March 2023
Paystubs indicating biweekly and annualized salary between August 2021 and March 2023

Similar Cases

Entrepreneur

Information Technology

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded

2024-12-26

The AAO withdrew the Director's decision and remanded the case because the Director's analysis was insufficient. The decision did not adequately explain the reasons for concluding that the Petitioner failed to satisfy five claimed criteria (lesser awards, published materials, original contributions, leading or critical role, and high salary), nor did it discuss the evidence submitted in response to the RFE. The Director's analysis regarding the Petitioner's intent to continue working was also found to be copied verbatim from the RFE, indicating a lack of proper evaluation of the submitted evidence.

Project Manager

Engineering · Jordan

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed

2024-07-10

The Petitioner failed to meet any of the evaluated EB-1A criteria. The awards were internal employer recognitions, memberships did not require outstanding achievements judged by experts, and there was no evidence of published material about the Petitioner or proof that his original contributions were of major significance in the field.

Others

USCIS EB-1A dismissed

2024-10-01

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of his field, despite meeting three initial criteria. Evidence of published material about the Petitioner was limited to 2023-2024, failing to show sustained acclaim over a long period. A single article published in 1990 lacked evidence of citations or sustained acclaim. A leading or critical role in 2014 also lacked evidence of sustained acclaim. Contributions to employers were noted, but major significance to the broader field of Stage Construction and Engineering as it applies to Art, Theatre, and Film Production was not established. Furthermore, the record lacked comparative salary data to prove a high salary in relation to others in the field, which would indicate being at the very top.

Research Scientist

Artificial Intelligence

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed

2024-12-23

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. Specifically, memberships in associations (AAAI, IAENG, IEEE Computer Society, ISAC) did not require outstanding achievements judged by experts, and some memberships were still processing or lacked supporting documentation. Original contributions lacked major significance, as support letters were conclusory and citation statistics did not demonstrate widespread influence or heavy reliance by other researchers. The Petitioner's leading/critical role as Director of ICT and AI researcher was not sufficiently proven with organizational charts or evidence of the organizations' distinguished reputations. Subsequent citations post-filing were not considered as eligibility must be met at the time of filing.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

More dismissed cases More Information Technology cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-08-20.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed

Criteria Met 3 / 3

Evidence Types 5

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 919

Success Rate 53.0%

Sustained 487

Dismissed 315

EB-1A Overview All EB-1A Cases EB-1A Dashboard

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist