dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Sales And Marketing Specialist

Sales And Marketing · Jordan · 2025-04-09

Decision Date
2025-04-09
Location
Texas
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

1 of 3 criteria met
Leading or critical role for distinguished organizations (Met)

The Director originally conceded this criterion, though the AAO reserved further discussion as the overall petition failed.

Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards (Not Met)

The honorary doctorate and other certificates were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence.

Published material about the alien in professional or major media (Not Met)

Articles lacked author credits, were promotional in nature, or did not contain substantial discussion of the Petitioner's work.

Original contributions of major significance (Not Met)

The Petitioner's patent was never registered, and there was no objective evidence that his ideas were implemented or influential in the field.

Authorship of scholarly articles (Not Met)

The submitted opinion piece was written for a general audience in a newspaper rather than a learned professional publication.

High salary or other significantly high remuneration (Not Met)

The evidence was for a role in procurement rather than sales/marketing, and the currency/amount relative to the field was not clearly established.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The Petitioner failed to meet the minimum of three criteria. Specifically, the honorary doctorate was not from a recognized institution, published materials lacked substantial discussion or author credits, original contributions (like the 'I-Mark' patent) were never actually registered or implemented, and salary evidence was inconsistent and from a different field (procurement).

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested corroboration for the significance of the Petitioner's contributions; the Petitioner provided letters that the AAO found to have negligible weight due to lack of objective proof.

RFE Targets
Original contributions of major significance

Evidence

Evidence Types
Awards
Media Coverage
Original Contributions
High Salary
Reference Letters Dependent
Evidence Submitted
  • ["2004 Patent application for 'I-Mark' (unregistered)", "Mobile application concept 'Feelings'", "Opinion piece in 'Al-Qabas' newspaper (2016)", "Advisory letters sent to Turkish government ministries", "Translated pay receipt from 2017", "Profile on 'Who's Who' (Man Hum) directory"]

Similar Cases

Associate Professor

Healthcare · Canada

WeGreened EB-1A approved
40 days 2026-02-19
The case was approved based on 47 peer-reviewed journal articles and 5 abstracts which garnered 1,369 citations, demonstrating significant independent reliance by the field. Additionally, the petitioner completed 20 peer reviews for selective clinical venues, satisfying the judging and scholarly articles criteria for EB-1A.

Assistant Professor

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Florida 16 days 2026-02-18
The case was approved based on a publication record of 33 peer-reviewed articles and 25 completed peer reviews. The petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability through high citation percentiles, with 10 papers ranked among the most highly cited for their years. Evidence of federal agency support and international reliance across 48 countries satisfied the EB-1A criteria.

Scientist

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Washington 20 days 2026-02-09
The petition satisfied EB-1A criteria through a portfolio of 14 journal articles, 6 conference articles, and 17 preprints, which garnered citations from researchers in 42 countries. Additionally, the petitioner completed at least 60 peer reviews for field journals. The evidence demonstrated a systems-level framework for multinode architectures that provides a practical roadmap for modular quantum systems.

Assistant Professor

Engineering · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
264 days 2026-02-06
The petition was approved based on meeting multiple EB-1A criteria, including influential authorship of 17 journal articles and 2 book chapters, and a strong citation impact of 321 citations. Additionally, the petitioner demonstrated extensive peer-review service with 110 completed reviews and provided evidence of original contributions of major significance to roadway safety and next-generation mobility.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-04-09.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 1 / 3
Evidence Types 5

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 919
Success Rate 53.0%
Sustained 487
Dismissed 315

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist