Sales And Marketing Specialist
Sales And Marketing · Jordan · 2025-04-09
Framework Evaluation
1 of 3 criteria metThe Director originally conceded this criterion, though the AAO reserved further discussion as the overall petition failed.
The honorary doctorate and other certificates were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence.
Articles lacked author credits, were promotional in nature, or did not contain substantial discussion of the Petitioner's work.
The Petitioner's patent was never registered, and there was no objective evidence that his ideas were implemented or influential in the field.
The submitted opinion piece was written for a general audience in a newspaper rather than a learned professional publication.
The evidence was for a role in procurement rather than sales/marketing, and the currency/amount relative to the field was not clearly established.
Why This Petition Was Denied
Request for Evidence (RFE)
Unsuccessfully AddressedThe RFE requested corroboration for the significance of the Petitioner's contributions; the Petitioner provided letters that the AAO found to have negligible weight due to lack of objective proof.
Evidence
- ["2004 Patent application for 'I-Mark' (unregistered)", "Mobile application concept 'Feelings'", "Opinion piece in 'Al-Qabas' newspaper (2016)", "Advisory letters sent to Turkish government ministries", "Translated pay receipt from 2017", "Profile on 'Who's Who' (Man Hum) directory"]
Similar Cases
Associate Professor
Healthcare · Canada
Assistant Professor
Research and Development · China
Scientist
Research and Development · China
Assistant Professor
Engineering · China
Frequently Asked Questions
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-04-09.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist