How common are denied EB-1A petitions?

EB-1A petition outcomes vary based on the strength of evidence, the specific criteria addressed, and the adjudicating officer. Each case is evaluated individually based on its own merits and documentation.

How does the mountain climbing industry affect EB-1A petition outcomes?

The mountain climbing sector has unique considerations for EB-1A petitions. USCIS evaluates whether the petitioner's qualifications and contributions align with the specific requirements of the visa category. Industry context matters for demonstrating the significance and impact of the petitioner's work.

dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Mountain Climber

Mountain Climbing · Nepal · 2024-05-13

Decision Date

2024-05-13

Location

Nebraska

This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

1 of 3 criteria met

Published Material (Met)

The Director and AAO agreed that the record contained qualifying published materials about the Petitioner's accomplishments.

Judging (Not Met)

The record did not establish that the Petitioner was invited to judge or actually completed judging activities.

Memberships (Not Met)

The Petitioner did not submit evidence that the associations required outstanding achievements as judged by national or international experts.

Original Contributions (Not Met)

Testimonial letters praised skills but did not explain how the Petitioner's work constituted contributions of major significance to the field.

Lesser Awards (Not Met)

The Petitioner did not establish that his awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The Petitioner only satisfied one criterion (published material) out of the required three. The judging criterion was withdrawn because there was no evidence of actual participation, and the membership criterion was not met as the Petitioner failed to provide bylaws showing that membership required outstanding achievements judged by experts. Additionally, the original contributions criterion was not met because the testimonial letters did not demonstrate a major impact on the field as a whole.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested evidence to satisfy the regulatory criteria; the Petitioner responded with additional letters and certificates, but they were deemed insufficient to meet the legal standard.

RFE Targets

JudgingMembershipsOriginal Contributions

Evidence

Evidence Types

Published Material

Awards

Professional Memberships

Judging Experience

Original Contributions

Reference Letters Dependent

Evidence Submitted

Published materials about the Petitioner's accomplishments
Evidence of awards and recognition
Memberships in Boy Scouts of America, NMA, NNMGA, and US Nepal Climbers Association
Testimonial letters from industry rover leaders and marketing directors
Participation as a keynote speaker for a fundraiser
Ascension of Mount Everest and other peaks

Similar Cases

Others

Sports

USCIS EB-1A dismissed

2025-03-13

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner met zero of the required three criteria. Specifically, evidence for awards (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)) lacked context on significance, and membership evidence (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ii)) failed to prove the 'outstanding achievements' requirement for the National Snowboarding Team. Other claimed criteria (published material and judging) were not reached as the first two were dispositive.

Entrepreneur

Information Technology

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded

2024-12-26

The AAO withdrew the Director's decision and remanded the case because the Director's analysis was insufficient. The decision did not adequately explain the reasons for concluding that the Petitioner failed to satisfy five claimed criteria (lesser awards, published materials, original contributions, leading or critical role, and high salary), nor did it discuss the evidence submitted in response to the RFE. The Director's analysis regarding the Petitioner's intent to continue working was also found to be copied verbatim from the RFE, indicating a lack of proper evaluation of the submitted evidence.

Project Manager

Engineering · Jordan

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed

2024-07-10

The Petitioner failed to meet any of the evaluated EB-1A criteria. The awards were internal employer recognitions, memberships did not require outstanding achievements judged by experts, and there was no evidence of published material about the Petitioner or proof that his original contributions were of major significance in the field.

Business Consultant

Consulting

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed

2024-02-20

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner did not satisfy the minimum of three regulatory criteria. Specifically, the 'Speaker of the Year' awards lacked evidence of national recognition, published materials lacked circulation statistics to qualify as major media, and the leading/critical role evidence failed to demonstrate significant impact on organizations with distinguished reputations.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

More dismissed cases More Sports cases More cases from Nepal

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-05-13.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed

RFE Issued

Criteria Met 1 / 3

Evidence Types 6

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881

Success Rate 52.9%

Sustained 466

Dismissed 299

EB-1A Overview EB-1A in Nepal All EB-1A Cases EB-1A Dashboard

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist