Martial Art Athlete And Coach

The motion to reconsider did not identify an incorrect application of law or policy, and the motion to reopen failed to provide significant new facts that would change the result. Specifically, coaching evidence was distinguished from athletic performance, and much of the evidence post-dated the initial filing.

The Petitioner failed to meet the awards, memberships, and published material criteria. While he received numerous medals in IBJJF competitions, there was insufficient evidence of their national or international recognition. Additionally, membership in 'D Team' did not require outstanding achievements as judged by experts, and the submitted articles lacked circulation data to qualify as major media.

The Petitioner satisfied only two criteria: awards (medals at IBJJF World Jiu-Jitsu and Brazilian National Championships) and judging (refereeing competitions). The membership criterion was not met because the IBJJF black belt certification was obtained after the filing date and the requirements did not demonstrate a review of outstanding achievements by experts. The leading/critical role criterion was not met as the Petitioner's volunteer refereeing for three one-day tournaments did not demonstrate significant importance to the organization's outcome, nor was the organization's distinguished reputation established.