Visalytics
Visalytics
dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Lawyer

Lawyer · Egypt · 2025-01-08

Decision Date
2025-01-08
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

0 of 3 criteria met
Membership in associations that require outstanding achievements (Not Met)

The Petitioner's membership in the Egyptian Bar Association (EBA) was found to be a mandatory requirement for practicing law in Egypt, not an indicator of outstanding achievement judged by national or international experts.

Leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments (Not Met)

The Petitioner failed to identify any organization or establishment with a distinguished reputation for which he performed in a leading or critical role, with client letters not sufficing as evidence.

High remuneration for services (Not Met)

The Petitioner's evidence for high salary was deemed insufficient as it did not provide an appropriate basis for comparison to others in the legal field.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to satisfy at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. Specifically, membership in the Egyptian Bar Association was deemed mandatory for practicing lawyers, not indicative of outstanding achievement. The Petitioner also failed to identify any distinguished organization for which he held a leading or critical role, and his claims of high remuneration were not supported by comparative evidence. The AAO found that the submitted evidence, including client letters, did not demonstrate the required sustained national or international acclaim.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested evidence that the Egyptian Bar Association (EBA) requires outstanding achievements for membership, as judged by recognized national or international experts, and documentation of the qualifications of the reviewers. The Petitioner responded with assertions and a law, but failed to provide corroborating evidence that the requirements amounted to outstanding achievements or that candidates were judged by experts.

RFE Targets
Membership in associations that require outstanding achievements

Evidence

Evidence Types
Professional Memberships
Original Contributions
Leading Role
High Salary
Reference Letters Dependent
Evidence Submitted
  • powers of attorney
  • letters from clients

Similar Cases

Lawyer

Legal Services

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2025-02-05
The appeal is dismissed because the Petitioner failed to satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria for extraordinary ability. Specifically, the Petitioner did not demonstrate receipt of nationally or internationally recognized awards, membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements, publications about her in major media (due to lack of certified translations and independent evidence), original contributions of major significance, a leading or critical role for distinguished organizations, or high remuneration for services (due to insufficient corroborating evidence). The Petitioner also abandoned claims for display of work and commercial successes.

Lawyer

Legal Services

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-01-10
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner's brief only addressed the original petition denial and her eligibility, rather than challenging the Director's most recent decision to dismiss her combined motion to reopen and reconsider. The AAO found that the Petitioner's failure to address why the Director's motion dismissal contained any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact was a sufficient basis for summary dismissal, and by not contesting the motion decision, she abandoned those claims.

Paralegal

Legal Services · Kazakhstan

USCIS EB-1A remanded
New York 2025-01-30
The Director denied the petition because the petitioner did not establish eligibility under at least three of the ten criteria, specifically rejecting claims for awards and published material. Additionally, the Director concluded that the practice of law does not fall within the enumerated fields for extraordinary ability. The AAO withdrew this decision, agreeing with the petitioner that law can qualify under 'science or art' or 'business', and remanded the case for a merits determination on the remaining four claimed criteria.

Lawyer

Legal Services · Brazil

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-07-30
The Petitioner failed the final merits determination because his judging experience (Ph.D. theses and tax judge) and scholarly articles (two books and a chapter, last in 2005) lacked evidence of widespread influence or sustained acclaim. His leading role at his law firm and high remuneration (R$10.7 million in 2015) were not sufficiently corroborated as being at the very top of the field compared to peers. Awards from Corporate INTL and Analise Advocacia 500 were not proven to be nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

More dismissed cases More Legal Services cases More cases from Egypt

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-01-08.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 5

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 882
Success Rate 52.8%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Related Pages

EB-1A Overview EB-1A in Egypt All EB-1A Cases EB-1A Dashboard

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist