remanded EB-1A RFE Issued
Web Developer And Digital Marketing Entrepreneur
IT Entrepreneurial Field · Russia · 2024-06-12
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Framework Evaluation
3 of 3 criteria metPublished Material (Met)
The Director found that the Petitioner submitted copies of published materials about herself in the IT entrepreneurial field.
Judging (Met)
The Petitioner provided evidence that she judged the work of others in the field.
Leading or Critical Role (Met)
The AAO found the Petitioner performed a leading role as CEO and founder of a distinguished Russian IT firm active since 2007.
Why This Petition Was Remanded
The decision was remanded because the Petitioner successfully met three criteria: published material, judging, and leading/critical role. The AAO withdrew the Director's finding regarding intent to work in the field, noting her U.S. LLC and CEO role. A final merits determination is now required to evaluate sustained national or international acclaim.
Request for Evidence (RFE)
Successfully AddressedThe RFE addressed the Petitioner's intent to work in the U.S. and the significance of her roles in organizations. She provided LLC documents and client agreements to demonstrate her ongoing professional activities.
RFE Targets
Leading or Critical Role
Evidence
Evidence Types
Media Coverage
Judging Experience
Awards
Leading Role
Evidence Submitted
- Published materials about the Petitioner in the IT entrepreneurial field
- Evidence of judging the work of others in the field
- Articles of organization and website for U.S. LLC
- Service agreements with two U.S. businesses
- Russian company policy manual listing CEO responsibilities
- Government and tax records showing sole ownership of Russian firm
Similar Cases
Entrepreneur
Food and Beverage
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
Colorado 2024-08-16
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary requirement of three criteria. Specifically, USCIS found that the claimed awards were not nationally or internationally recognized, the published materials were not in major media, and the claimed judging experience was merely mentorship or on-the-job training, not actual judging of others' work. No specific metrics like publication or citation counts were provided or met.
Entrepreneur
Consulting
USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-08-23
The Director denied the petition because the Petitioner only met two of the required three initial evidentiary criteria: judging (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv)) and scholarly articles (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vi)). The AAO, upon de novo review, concluded that the Petitioner also met the criterion for published material about them in major media (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii)), overturning the Director's finding on this point. Specifically, the AAO found that press coverage of the Petitioner's corporate work, including articles from China Youth Daily, China News Service, 21st Century Business Herald, China Enterprise News, Xinmin Weekly, The Morning Express, Southern Metropolis Daily, Nan Fang Daily Press, and Technology Entrepreneurship, along with supporting documentation, was sufficient to establish this criterion. Therefore, with three criteria met, the case was remanded for a final merits determination.
Entrepreneur
Real Estate · Bulgaria
USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-09-06
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence requirements of either a one-time major internationally recognized award or at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. Specifically, the Petitioner did not contest the denial of the 'prizes or awards' criterion. The 'high salary' criterion was denied because new claims and evidence regarding outside investment and equity holdings were not presented to the Director. The 'membership' criterion was not met as the Bulgarian Investment and Construction Association (BISA) did not require outstanding achievements as a condition for membership. The 'original contributions' criterion was not satisfied because the Petitioner's work, while successful in his home country, was not shown to have made an original, major significant contribution to the field as a whole, lacking evidence of widespread application or emulation.
Business Development Manager
Telecommunications
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-09-12
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to satisfy at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. Specifically, the Petitioner only met the 'judging' criterion. The 'original contributions of major significance' criterion was not met as the Petitioner's product development work, guest lecture, book, and financial work were not shown to have had substantial influence beyond his employers or clients, nor were they considered to be of major significance in the field. The 'scholarly articles' criterion was not met because the submitted book was not considered a scholarly article and was not shown to be published in a professional or major trade publication or other major media for learned persons. The AAO also noted that the Petitioner did not demonstrate national or international acclaim or that he is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Frequently Asked Questions
A remanded EB-1A petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-06-12.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome remanded
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 3 / 3
Evidence Types 4
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist