dismissed EB-1A

Physical Therapist

Healthcare Sector · Brazil · 2025-04-09

Decision Date
2025-04-09
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

1 of 3 criteria met
Published Material (Met)

The Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of published material about him and his work.

Original Contributions of Major Significance (Not Met)

While the software was an original contribution, there was no evidence of major significance or widespread adoption in the field.

Leading or Critical Role (Not Met)

The Petitioner performed a leading role for his company, but the company was not shown to have a distinguished reputation.

High Salary (Not Met)

The AAO reserved consideration of this criterion as the Petitioner could not meet the required three criteria regardless of the outcome.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The Petitioner met only one criterion (published material). The 'original contributions' claim was rejected because his software lacked evidence of widespread adoption or substantial influence beyond his own clients, with 'views' data being insufficient. The 'leading or critical role' claim failed because, although he held a leadership position in his own firm, the record did not establish the company had a 'distinguished reputation' marked by eminence or excellence.

Evidence

Evidence Types
Original Contributions
Reference Letters Dependent
High Salary
Evidence Submitted
  • Published material about the petitioner and his work
  • Development of a downloadable program for evaluating patients in home care
  • Six recommendation letters from experts
  • Intellectual property rights for a patient assessment tool
  • Experience establishing and managing two healthcare companies in Brazil
  • Newspaper article (2014) regarding his program and company

Similar Cases

Associate Professor

Healthcare · Canada

WeGreened EB-1A approved
40 days 2026-02-19
The case was approved based on 47 peer-reviewed journal articles and 5 abstracts which garnered 1,369 citations, demonstrating significant independent reliance by the field. Additionally, the petitioner completed 20 peer reviews for selective clinical venues, satisfying the judging and scholarly articles criteria for EB-1A.

Assistant Professor

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Florida 16 days 2026-02-18
The case was approved based on a publication record of 33 peer-reviewed articles and 25 completed peer reviews. The petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability through high citation percentiles, with 10 papers ranked among the most highly cited for their years. Evidence of federal agency support and international reliance across 48 countries satisfied the EB-1A criteria.

Scientist

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Washington 20 days 2026-02-09
The petition satisfied EB-1A criteria through a portfolio of 14 journal articles, 6 conference articles, and 17 preprints, which garnered citations from researchers in 42 countries. Additionally, the petitioner completed at least 60 peer reviews for field journals. The evidence demonstrated a systems-level framework for multinode architectures that provides a practical roadmap for modular quantum systems.

Assistant Professor

Engineering · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
264 days 2026-02-06
The petition was approved based on meeting multiple EB-1A criteria, including influential authorship of 17 journal articles and 2 book chapters, and a strong citation impact of 321 citations. Additionally, the petitioner demonstrated extensive peer-review service with 110 completed reviews and provided evidence of original contributions of major significance to roadway safety and next-generation mobility.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-04-09.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 1 / 3
Evidence Types 3

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 919
Success Rate 53.0%
Sustained 487
Dismissed 315

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist