Physical Therapist
Healthcare Sector · Brazil · 2025-04-09
Framework Evaluation
1 of 3 criteria metThe Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence of published material about him and his work.
While the software was an original contribution, there was no evidence of major significance or widespread adoption in the field.
The Petitioner performed a leading role for his company, but the company was not shown to have a distinguished reputation.
The AAO reserved consideration of this criterion as the Petitioner could not meet the required three criteria regardless of the outcome.
Why This Petition Was Denied
Evidence
- Published material about the petitioner and his work
- Development of a downloadable program for evaluating patients in home care
- Six recommendation letters from experts
- Intellectual property rights for a patient assessment tool
- Experience establishing and managing two healthcare companies in Brazil
- Newspaper article (2014) regarding his program and company
Similar Cases
Associate Professor
Healthcare · Canada
Assistant Professor
Research and Development · China
Scientist
Research and Development · China
Assistant Professor
Engineering · China
Frequently Asked Questions
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-04-09.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist