Visalytics
Visalytics
dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Hairstylist

Hairstyling Industry · Brazil · 2025-04-10

Decision Date
2025-04-10
Location
Florida
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

0 of 3 criteria met
Published Material (Not Met)

Articles were identical press releases or did not focus primarily on the Petitioner.

Original Contributions (Not Met)

The 'innovative' technique was actually part of a standard training course the Petitioner attended.

Artistic Display (Not Met)

The events were commercial beauty industry tradeshows or salon promotions rather than artistic exhibitions.

Judging (Not Met)

Lack of contemporaneous evidence and contradictory letters regarding the Petitioner's role as a judge.

Leading or Critical Role (Not Met)

Letters lacked detail on how the role was critical and failed to establish the distinguished reputation of the organizations.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The Petitioner failed all claimed EB-1A criteria; published materials were identified as press releases with no established authorship, and original contributions were found to be techniques learned in a 240-hour training course rather than developed by the Petitioner. Evidence of artistic display was deemed commercial rather than artistic, and letters of support contained significant anomalies, such as using the future tense for past events and missing contact information. No criteria were satisfied.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE asked for proof of major media status and detailed evidence of contributions; the Petitioner submitted web traffic data and new letters which USCIS found lacked probative value.

RFE Targets
Published MaterialOriginal ContributionsJudgingLeading or Critical Role

Evidence

Evidence Types
Media Coverage
Reference Letters Dependent
Conference Presentations
Judging Experience
Original Contributions
Evidence Submitted
  • 23 online articles (mostly dated April 9, 2021)
  • Certificate for 240 hours of training in capillary therapy (2023)
  • Participation in a beauty industry tradeshow (The Hair Show)
  • Expert recommendation letters from salon owners and clients
  • Photographs of hair treatments (before-and-after)

Similar Cases

Associate Professor

Healthcare · Canada

WeGreened EB-1A approved
40 days 2026-02-19
The case was approved based on 47 peer-reviewed journal articles and 5 abstracts which garnered 1,369 citations, demonstrating significant independent reliance by the field. Additionally, the petitioner completed 20 peer reviews for selective clinical venues, satisfying the judging and scholarly articles criteria for EB-1A.
View Case

Assistant Professor

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Florida 16 days 2026-02-18
The case was approved based on a publication record of 33 peer-reviewed articles and 25 completed peer reviews. The petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability through high citation percentiles, with 10 papers ranked among the most highly cited for their years. Evidence of federal agency support and international reliance across 48 countries satisfied the EB-1A criteria.
View Case

Scientist

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Washington 20 days 2026-02-09
The petition satisfied EB-1A criteria through a portfolio of 14 journal articles, 6 conference articles, and 17 preprints, which garnered citations from researchers in 42 countries. Additionally, the petitioner completed at least 60 peer reviews for field journals. The evidence demonstrated a systems-level framework for multinode architectures that provides a practical roadmap for modular quantum systems.
View Case

Assistant Professor

Engineering · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
264 days 2026-02-06
The petition was approved based on meeting multiple EB-1A criteria, including influential authorship of 17 journal articles and 2 book chapters, and a strong citation impact of 321 citations. Additionally, the petitioner demonstrated extensive peer-review service with 110 completed reviews and provided evidence of original contributions of major significance to roadway safety and next-generation mobility.
View Case

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

More dismissed cases More Hair and Beauty cases More cases from Brazil

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-04-10.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 5

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 919
Success Rate 53.0%
Sustained 487
Dismissed 315

Related Pages

EB-1A Overview EB-1A in Brazil All EB-1A Cases EB-1A Dashboard

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist