dismissed EB-1A
Integration Architect
Energy Efficiency · 2024-12-16
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Framework Evaluation
0 of 3 criteria metOriginal scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field (Not Met)
The Petitioner's four recommendation letters failed to demonstrate that his contributions were of major significance to the overall field, instead limiting their impact to his employers.
Why This Petition Was Denied
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the 'original contributions of major significance' criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v)). The recommendation letters provided were deemed insufficient as they limited the significance of the Petitioner's contributions to his employers (e.g., 'annual saving of over a million USD' for one employer, 'saved millions of dollars to bank' for another) rather than demonstrating major significance to the overall field of energy efficiency. USCIS did not evaluate the other claimed criteria (leading or critical role, high salary) because the Petitioner could not fulfill the initial requirement of meeting three criteria.
Evidence
Evidence Types
Reference Letters Dependent
Original Contributions
Evidence Submitted
- four recommendation letters
Similar Cases
Software Engineer
Information Technology
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-04-17
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to state new facts, reasserting arguments already made on appeal. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner provided only conclusory assertions without specific evidence or legal precedent to show the prior decision was incorrect. The Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold of meeting three EB-1A criteria, rendering a final merits determination unnecessary.
Unknown Position
Renewable Energy
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-10-09
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. Specifically, the Petitioner did not establish that published material about him was in professional or major media, that his original contributions were of major significance to the overall field, or that his organization had a distinguished reputation. The AAO found the evidence, including letters and testimonials, to be conclusory and lacking specific details to corroborate major significance or distinguished reputation. The record did not support a conclusion that the Petitioner established the acclaim and recognition required for the classification.
Entrepreneur
Information Technology
USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-12-26
The AAO withdrew the Director's decision and remanded the case because the Director's analysis was insufficient. The decision did not adequately explain the reasons for concluding that the Petitioner failed to satisfy five claimed criteria (lesser awards, published materials, original contributions, leading or critical role, and high salary), nor did it discuss the evidence submitted in response to the RFE. The Director's analysis regarding the Petitioner's intent to continue working was also found to be copied verbatim from the RFE, indicating a lack of proper evaluation of the submitted evidence.
Unknown Position
Unknown Industry
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-01-30
The motion to reopen was dismissed due to a lack of new facts or documentary evidence. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. Specifically, the AAO found its reliance on Krasniqi v. Dibbins for merit-based awards was correct, the petitioner's awards were for participation, not excellence. The petitioner also failed to show error in the analysis of the leading or critical role criterion, or the high salary criterion, as no comparative evidence was provided to show the salary was high in relation to others in the field.
Frequently Asked Questions
A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-12-16.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 2
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist