dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Systems Engineer

Education Technology · 2025-04-14

Decision Date
2025-04-14
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

2 of 3 criteria met
Leading or Critical Role (Met)

The Service Center previously determined the Petitioner satisfied this criterion.

High Salary (Met)

The Service Center previously determined the Petitioner satisfied this criterion.

Original Contributions of Major Significance (Not Met)

The evidence failed to detail the Petitioner's specific original contributions or demonstrate their significance to the field of education technology at large.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The Petitioner failed to meet the required three criteria for EB-1A classification. While leading role and high salary were met, the 'original contributions of major significance' criterion was not satisfied because the evidence (recommendation letters and articles) focused on the platform's success rather than the Petitioner's specific original impact on the field. Additionally, new claims for memberships and judging were rejected as they were raised for the first time on appeal.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE addressed deficiencies in the evidence for original contributions of major significance; the Petitioner provided letters and articles that were ultimately deemed insufficient to show field-wide impact.

RFE Targets
Original Contributions of Major Significance

Evidence

Evidence Types
Grants
Media Coverage
Reference Letters Dependent
High Salary
Evidence Submitted
  • Evidence of leading or critical role (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(viii))
  • Evidence of high salary or other remuneration (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ix))
  • Recommendation letter from the founder and CEO of Doctor CV
  • Articles and website information regarding the Doctor CV platform
  • Grants received for the development of the Doctor CV platform from the governments of Peru and Chile

Similar Cases

Associate Professor

Healthcare · Canada

WeGreened EB-1A approved
40 days 2026-02-19
The case was approved based on 47 peer-reviewed journal articles and 5 abstracts which garnered 1,369 citations, demonstrating significant independent reliance by the field. Additionally, the petitioner completed 20 peer reviews for selective clinical venues, satisfying the judging and scholarly articles criteria for EB-1A.

Assistant Professor

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Florida 16 days 2026-02-18
The case was approved based on a publication record of 33 peer-reviewed articles and 25 completed peer reviews. The petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability through high citation percentiles, with 10 papers ranked among the most highly cited for their years. Evidence of federal agency support and international reliance across 48 countries satisfied the EB-1A criteria.

Scientist

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Washington 20 days 2026-02-09
The petition satisfied EB-1A criteria through a portfolio of 14 journal articles, 6 conference articles, and 17 preprints, which garnered citations from researchers in 42 countries. Additionally, the petitioner completed at least 60 peer reviews for field journals. The evidence demonstrated a systems-level framework for multinode architectures that provides a practical roadmap for modular quantum systems.

Assistant Professor

Engineering · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
264 days 2026-02-06
The petition was approved based on meeting multiple EB-1A criteria, including influential authorship of 17 journal articles and 2 book chapters, and a strong citation impact of 321 citations. Additionally, the petitioner demonstrated extensive peer-review service with 110 completed reviews and provided evidence of original contributions of major significance to roadway safety and next-generation mobility.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-04-14.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 2 / 3
Evidence Types 4

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 919
Success Rate 53.0%
Sustained 487
Dismissed 315

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist