remanded EB-1A RFE Issued
Culinary Arts
Culinary Arts · 2024-05-22
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Why This Petition Was Remanded
The decision was remanded because the Director applied the wrong legal standard, evaluating the case for a National Interest Waiver rather than Extraordinary Ability. The original decision failed to explain why the Petitioner did not meet the EB-1A criteria. No specific metrics like publication or citation counts were discussed as the underlying merits were not properly adjudicated.
Request for Evidence (RFE)
Unsuccessfully AddressedThe Director issued an RFE acknowledging the EB-1A request and addressing relevant criteria, but subsequently denied the petition based on unrelated EB-2 NIW criteria.
Similar Cases
Unknown Position
Unknown Industry
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-01-30
The motion to reopen was dismissed due to a lack of new facts or documentary evidence. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. Specifically, the AAO found its reliance on Krasniqi v. Dibbins for merit-based awards was correct, the petitioner's awards were for participation, not excellence. The petitioner also failed to show error in the analysis of the leading or critical role criterion, or the high salary criterion, as no comparative evidence was provided to show the salary was high in relation to others in the field.
Others
Others
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-05-21
The motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that the prior summary dismissal was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. Although the Petitioner provided a copy of a supplemental brief, it was incorrectly mailed to Arizona instead of the AAO, and the Petitioner offered no new facts to overcome the grounds for the original dismissal.
Unknown Position
Performing Arts
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-01-30
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to submit new, determinative evidence that the awards had national or international recognition, with some evidence being dated after the filing date. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner did not establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy, merely disagreeing with the conclusions. The Petitioner's participation in an artistic performance show was not considered a competition awarding prizes, and photos of participation did not prove the requisite recognition of awards.
Unknown Position
Unknown Industry
USCIS EB-1A remanded
2025-01-10
The Director's decision was based on the Petitioner's failure to demonstrate a major, internationally recognized award and to meet at least three of the ten regulatory criteria for extraordinary ability. The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) decided to remand the matter for the Director to fully consider the record, including new evidence submitted with the appeal, and to issue a new decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
A remanded EB-1A petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-05-22.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome remanded
RFE Issued
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 919
Success Rate 53.0%
Sustained 487
Dismissed 315
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist