Visalytics
Visalytics
remanded EB-1A RFE Issued

Engineering Consultant

Civil Engineering · India · 2025-04-10

Decision Date
2025-04-10
Location
United States
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

3 of 3 criteria met
Judging the work of others (Met)

The Petitioner reviewed and evaluated more than 50 research papers by peers.

Authorship of scholarly articles (Met)

The Petitioner authored or co-authored 15 research papers and three technical reports.

Original contributions of major significance (Met)

Research generated 248 citations, ranking in the top 1% of the field, with expert letters confirming nationwide implementation of his guidelines and algorithms.

Memberships in associations (Not Met)

The research board committee did not require 'outstanding achievements' marked by eminence and distinction for membership, and there was no evidence members were judged by recognized experts.

High salary or remuneration (Not Met)

The AAO reserved consideration of this criterion as three others were already met.

Why This Petition Was Remanded

The Petitioner satisfied three EB-1A criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and original contributions of major significance. The AAO withdrew the Director's negative finding on original contributions based on high citation counts and expert testimony. The case was remanded for a final merits determination to evaluate sustained national or international acclaim.

Evidence

Evidence Types
Peer Reviewed Publications
Citations
Reference Letters Independent
Judging Experience
Original Contributions
Evidence Submitted
  • 15 research papers and 3 technical reports
  • Review and evaluation of more than 50 research papers
  • 248 citations (top 1% of most-cited authors in the field since 2018)
  • 2018 article with 97 citations (top 10% of civil engineering articles that year)
  • Development of machine-learning algorithms for object detection in civil engineering
  • Framework for Civil Integration Management (CIM) for state transportation agencies
  • Guidelines for unmanned aerial systems in transportation operations

Similar Cases

Associate Professor

Healthcare · Canada

WeGreened EB-1A approved
40 days 2026-02-19
The case was approved based on 47 peer-reviewed journal articles and 5 abstracts which garnered 1,369 citations, demonstrating significant independent reliance by the field. Additionally, the petitioner completed 20 peer reviews for selective clinical venues, satisfying the judging and scholarly articles criteria for EB-1A.
View Case

Assistant Professor

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Florida 16 days 2026-02-18
The case was approved based on a publication record of 33 peer-reviewed articles and 25 completed peer reviews. The petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability through high citation percentiles, with 10 papers ranked among the most highly cited for their years. Evidence of federal agency support and international reliance across 48 countries satisfied the EB-1A criteria.
View Case

Scientist

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
Washington 20 days 2026-02-09
The petition satisfied EB-1A criteria through a portfolio of 14 journal articles, 6 conference articles, and 17 preprints, which garnered citations from researchers in 42 countries. Additionally, the petitioner completed at least 60 peer reviews for field journals. The evidence demonstrated a systems-level framework for multinode architectures that provides a practical roadmap for modular quantum systems.
View Case

Assistant Professor

Engineering · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
264 days 2026-02-06
The petition was approved based on meeting multiple EB-1A criteria, including influential authorship of 17 journal articles and 2 book chapters, and a strong citation impact of 321 citations. Additionally, the petitioner demonstrated extensive peer-review service with 110 completed reviews and provided evidence of original contributions of major significance to roadway safety and next-generation mobility.
View Case

Frequently Asked Questions

A remanded EB-1A petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.

Browse More Cases

More remanded cases More Engineering cases More cases from India

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-04-10.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome remanded
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 3 / 3
Evidence Types 5

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 919
Success Rate 53.0%
Sustained 487
Dismissed 315

Related Pages

EB-1A Overview EB-1A in India All EB-1A Cases EB-1A Dashboard

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist