approved EB-1A
Chief Scientific Officer
Bioinformatics · India · 2025-12-01
This case is from a publicly available case study. Case studies tend to feature successful outcomes and may not reflect the full range of petition results.
Framework Evaluation
4 of 3 criteria metScholarly Articles (Met)
The petitioner authored 21 peer-reviewed journal articles and 5 abstracts in the field of bioinformatics.
Judging (Met)
The petitioner completed 36 peer reviews for prestigious journals in the field.
Original Contributions (Met)
The petitioner's work in computational protein modeling resulted in 2,148 citations and a granted patent, representing contributions of major significance.
Leading or Critical Role (Met)
The petitioner served as Chief Scientific Officer and held a critical leadership role at a distinguished cancer research institute.
Why This Petition Was Approved
The petition was approved based on 21 peer-reviewed journal articles and 2,148 citations, which placed the petitioner in the top 1% of highly cited authors. Additionally, the applicant provided evidence of 36 peer reviews for prestigious journals and a granted patent. The case satisfied EB-1A criteria through scholarly articles, original contributions of major significance, and a leading/critical role in a distinguished organization.
Evidence
Evidence Types
Peer Reviewed Publications
Citations
Patents
Reference Letters Independent
Grants
Conference Presentations
Judging Experience
Original Contributions
Government Alignment
Evidence Submitted
- 21 peer-reviewed journal articles (2 first-authored, 4 co-first-authored)
- 5 abstracts (2 first-authored, 1 co-first-authored)
- 1 granted patent
- 2,148 citations (Top 1% of the field)
- 36 peer reviews for prestigious journals
- Critical leadership role at a distinguished cancer research institute
- Seven expert recommendation letters
Similar Cases
Scientist
Biotechnology · China
WeGreened EB-1A approved
California 428 days 2025-04-09
The petition was approved based on meeting at least three EB-1A criteria: scholarly articles, peer review, and original contributions. Specific metrics included 17 peer-reviewed journal articles, 904 citations on Google Scholar, and 24 instances of peer review service. The case also highlighted significant research funding from the National Cancer Institute and National Science Foundation as evidence of the work's importance.
Others
Biotechnology · United Kingdom
WeGreened EB-1A approved
20 days 2025-12-09
The petition was approved based on the satisfaction of at least three EB-1A criteria, including scholarly articles, judging, and original contributions of major significance. Specific metrics included 8 peer-reviewed journal articles, 904 citations, and 15 peer review assignments for influential AI and computational venues. The case was strengthened by evidence of competitive funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Roche GmbH.
Research Scientist
Artificial Intelligence · China
WeGreened EB-1A approved
Maryland 207 days 2025-10-14
The petition was approved based on 11 peer-reviewed articles and 2 preprints with 236 citations, placing several papers in the top 10% of the field. The petitioner satisfied EB-1A criteria through 11 peer reviews for leading journals, serving as an area chair for an international AI conference, and participating in federal grant reviews. His work on AI transparency and reliability was also recognized for its alignment with U.S. government regulatory initiatives.
Scientist
Pharmaceuticals · China
WeGreened EB-1A approved
Massachusetts 21 days 2025-05-29
The petition was approved based on the satisfaction of at least three EB-1A criteria: authorship of scholarly articles, participation as a judge of the work of others, and original scientific contributions of major significance. Specific metrics included 8 peer-reviewed publications in elite journals like Nature Microbiology, 260 citations placing him in the top 1% of his field, and the completion of over 20 peer reviews for high-impact journals.
Frequently Asked Questions
A approved EB-1A (I-140) petition means USCIS determined the petitioner met the eligibility requirements. For appealed cases, "sustained" means the appeal reversed a prior denial. The petitioner can proceed to the next step in the immigration process.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-12-01.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome approved
Processing 7 days
Criteria Met 4 / 3
Evidence Types 9
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 919
Success Rate 53.0%
Sustained 487
Dismissed 315
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist