dismissed EB-1A
Actor
Actor · 2022-09-19
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Framework Evaluation
3 of 3 criteria metWhy This Petition Was Denied
The motion was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the previous decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy regarding the 'final merits determination' stage. Although three criteria were met, the evidence did not support a finding of sustained acclaim or status at the top of the field. The Petitioner primarily repeated previous legal arguments rather than challenging the specific factual merits of the prior denial.
Evidence
Evidence Submitted
- Three of the ten evidentiary criteria were met (specifics not detailed in this motion decision)
Similar Cases
Others
Performing Arts
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-02-18
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the Petitioner did not submit new facts or documentary evidence. The motion to reconsider was dismissed as the Petitioner failed to establish that the prior AAO decision (November 2024) was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. Specifically, the Petitioner did not identify specific errors regarding the 'published material' (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii)) and 'commercial success' (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(x)) criteria, nor did they show error in reserving the totality of the evidence analysis.
Others
Media
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-02-21
The Petitioner did not meet the minimum requirement of satisfying at least three EB-1A criteria, which precluded a final merits determination. The motion to reconsider was dismissed as it broadly disagreed with prior conclusions without identifying specific legal errors, and the motion to reopen was dismissed for failing to provide new facts or documentary evidence.
Unknown Position
Others
USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-09-04
The AAO withdrew the Director's decision and remanded the case because the Director incorrectly concluded that the Petitioner did not articulate what evidence was being submitted for consideration under at least three of the 10 initial evidentiary criteria. The AAO found that the Petitioner's RFE response brief clearly articulated evidence for the first, fifth, and ninth criteria, thus necessitating a new decision by the Director.
Unknown Position
Unknown Industry
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-01-30
The motion to reopen was dismissed due to a lack of new facts or documentary evidence. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. Specifically, the AAO found its reliance on Krasniqi v. Dibbins for merit-based awards was correct, the petitioner's awards were for participation, not excellence. The petitioner also failed to show error in the analysis of the leading or critical role criterion, or the high salary criterion, as no comparative evidence was provided to show the salary was high in relation to others in the field.
Frequently Asked Questions
A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2022-09-19.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 3 / 3
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist