Visalytics
Visalytics
dismissed EB-1A RFE Issued

Assistant Adjunct Professor

Veterinary Science Field · Nepal · 2024-02-05

Decision Date
2024-02-05
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

2 of 3 criteria met
Authorship of Scholarly Articles (Met)

The record supports the finding that the Petitioner authored scholarly articles in the veterinary science field.

Judging the Work of Others (Met)

Evidence showed the Petitioner served on panels in 2021 and 2022 to judge research articles by students in his field.

Lesser Prizes or Awards (Not Met)

Awards were primarily student-focused and lacked evidence of national or international recognition beyond the awarding organizations.

Memberships in Associations (Not Met)

The Petitioner did not demonstrate that memberships required outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts.

Published Material About the Alien (Not Met)

Articles submitted were about scholarship receipts or travel grants and did not discuss the Petitioner's work substantially.

Original Contributions of Major Significance (Not Met)

Expert letters failed to detail a specific impact on the field or show that the work was widely adopted or replicated.

Leading or Critical Role (Not Met)

The roles described (ambassador, curriculum editor) lacked sufficient detail to prove they were leading or critical for organizations with distinguished reputations.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner only satisfied two criteria: scholarly articles and judging. The awards were deemed student-level and lacked national recognition; memberships did not require outstanding achievements; and expert letters failed to demonstrate that the research had 'major significance' or widespread impact in the field.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Unsuccessfully Addressed

The RFE requested specific documentation like bylaws and more evidence of national recognition. The Petitioner provided additional letters and curriculum copies, but they did not satisfy the regulatory requirements.

RFE Targets
Lesser Prizes or AwardsMemberships in AssociationsPublished Material About the AlienJudging the Work of OthersOriginal Contributions of Major SignificanceLeading or Critical Role

Evidence

Evidence Types
Peer Reviewed Publications
Awards
Judging Experience
Scholarly Articles
Reference Letters Dependent
Original Contributions
Evidence Submitted
  • Authorship of scholarly articles in peer-reviewed journals
  • Participation as a judge for research articles by undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral students (2021-2022)
  • Expert recommendation letters from university professors and industry managers
  • Research on avian flu virus, chicken feed organic acids, and polyphenol effects

Similar Cases

Associate Professor

Healthcare · India

WeGreened EB-1A rfe approved
Virginia 104 days 2025-07-24
The petition was approved based on meeting three EB-1A criteria: original contributions of major significance, authorship of scholarly articles, and service as a judge of others' work. Evidence included 18 peer-reviewed journal articles, 18 conference abstracts, 3 book chapters, and 141 citations. Additionally, her completion of 24 peer reviews for specialized journals established her status as a trusted authority.
View Case

Postdoctoral Researcher

Biotechnology · India

WeGreened EB-1A approved
New York 10 days 2025-05-15
The petition was approved based on 45 peer-reviewed journal articles and 659 citations, placing the applicant in the top 2% of authors in animal science. The applicant demonstrated extraordinary ability through 112 peer reviews and securing funding from prestigious institutions like the NIH and AKC Canine Health Foundation. These metrics satisfied the EB-1A criteria for scholarly articles, original contributions, and judging roles.
View Case

Assistant Professor

Research and Development · India

USCIS EB-1A remanded
United States 2024-03-19
The Petitioner authored 16 peer-reviewed articles and one book chapter, generating nearly 600 citations, with 12 articles ranking in the top 10% of the field. Expert letters confirmed his original contributions, including the discovery of 100 unclassified biosynthetic gene clusters and the development of a mass spectrometry data interface. The AAO determined these factors satisfied the 'original contributions of major significance' criterion.

Postdoctoral Researcher

Agriculture

USCIS EB-1A rfe remanded
2024-10-02
The Director's decision was remanded because the explanation for denying the 'original contributions of major significance' criterion was insufficient, particularly regarding the evaluation of citation data and reference letters. The AAO found the Petitioner met two criteria (judging, scholarly articles) but not two others (published material, leading/critical role). The Director failed to adequately explain why the submitted evidence for original contributions was insufficient, preventing an effective appeal.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

More dismissed cases More Education cases More cases from Nepal

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-02-05.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 2 / 3
Evidence Types 6

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Related Pages

EB-1A Overview EB-1A in Nepal All EB-1A Cases EB-1A Dashboard

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist