Visalytics
Visalytics
remanded EB-1A RFE Issued

Researcher

Researcher · 2025-03-10

Decision Date
2025-03-10
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

3 of 3 criteria met
Judging the work of others (Met)

The Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner participated as a judge of the work of others in her field.

Scholarly articles (Met)

The Petitioner established authorship of approximately 89 articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Original contributions of major significance (Met)

The Petitioner's research on climate warming effects and carbon budgets was found to be of major significance, supported by expert letters and citation evidence.

Why This Petition Was Remanded

The Petitioner satisfied three criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and original contributions of major significance. Specifically, she authored 89 peer-reviewed articles with a significant number of citations and provided expert letters detailing her impact on global-scale carbon models and climate change research. The Director's initial denial regarding the original contributions criterion was withdrawn upon de novo review.

Request for Evidence (RFE)

Successfully Addressed

The RFE addressed the Petitioner's eligibility at the time of filing, specifically regarding the impact of her original research. The Petitioner provided updated citation metrics and expert testimony in response.

RFE Targets
Original contributions of major significance

Evidence

Evidence Types
Peer Reviewed Publications
Citations
Scholarly Articles
Judging Experience
Original Contributions
Reference Letters Independent
Evidence Submitted
  • 89 peer-reviewed articles in scientific journals
  • Significant number of citations (Google Scholar report)
  • Participation as a judge of the work of others
  • Original research on Changbai Mountain tundra climate warming
  • Research on carbon sinks and soil/root carbon balance in forests
  • Development of global-scale carbon models

Similar Cases

Research Scientist

Agriculture

USCIS EB-1A remanded
2025-01-16
The Petitioner met three criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and original contributions of major significance. She authored approximately 20 peer-reviewed articles with a significant number of citations. Expert letters confirmed her 'pioneer studies' in post-thaw recovery and her development of a unique computational pipeline for metabolome-transcriptome associations.

Research Scientist

Research and Development · China

WeGreened EB-1A approved
California 35 days 2025-10-28
The petition was approved based on a prolific research record of 22 peer-reviewed journal articles and 8 scientific abstracts. The petitioner demonstrated substantial influence with 288 citations and significant judging contributions through 30 peer-review assignments. Additionally, major funding from U.S. scientific agencies validated the national priority of the research.
View Case

Associate Professor

Social Sciences · Pakistan

WeGreened EB-1A rfe approved
Malaysia 97 days 2025-09-18
The approval was based on a record of 82 peer-reviewed journal articles and a massive citation count of 13,759, placing the petitioner in the top 0.01% of cited researchers. Additionally, the petitioner demonstrated expertise through 23 peer reviews for international journals and strong expert testimony regarding their impact on global carbon emission reduction efforts.
View Case

Research Scientist

Research and Development · India

USCIS EB-1A remanded
Texas 2024-07-25
The Petitioner satisfied three criteria: judging (peer review), original contributions (1,100+ citations with three articles cited over 100 times), and scholarly articles. The AAO withdrew the Director's denial because the evidence cumulatively met the regulatory threshold for original contributions of major significance. The matter was remanded for a final merits determination to assess sustained national or international acclaim.

Frequently Asked Questions

A remanded EB-1A petition means the case was sent back to the field office for further review. This happens when procedural errors are found or additional evidence should be considered. It is neither an approval nor a denial.

Browse More Cases

More remanded cases More Environmental Services cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2025-03-10.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome remanded
RFE Issued
Criteria Met 3 / 3
Evidence Types 6

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Related Pages

EB-1A Overview All EB-1A Cases EB-1A Dashboard

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist