dismissed EB-1A

Pole Fitness Performer

Pole And Arial Sport · 2024-10-29

Decision Date
2024-10-29
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.

Framework Evaluation

0 of 3 criteria met
Receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor (Not Met)

The Director initially indicated this criterion was met, but the AAO withdrew this favorable determination. The Petitioner failed to provide probative evidence that her prizes or awards, or the competitions themselves, were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence, despite some competition titles containing 'National'.

Why This Petition Was Denied

The appeal was dismissed for two independent and alternate reasons. First, the Petitioner failed to satisfy the burden of production and persuasion by not informing USCIS how the voluminous evidence submitted in response to the NOID adhered to specific statutory, regulatory, and policy provisions, forcing USCIS to guess at eligibility. Second, regarding the awards criterion, while the Director initially found it met, the AAO agreed with the final merits determination that the Petitioner did not provide probative evidence to establish that her prizes or awards, or the competitions themselves, were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, despite some competition titles including 'National'. The AAO withdrew the Director's favorable determination for this criterion.

Evidence

Evidence Types
Awards
Judging Experience
Original Contributions
Exhibitions
Evidence Submitted
  • awards
  • judging
  • exhibitions
  • original_contributions

Similar Cases

Athlete

Sports

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-04-17
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three EB-1A criteria. Awards won after the March 2023 filing date were ineligible for consideration, and the Petitioner failed to provide specific arguments or context for the leading/critical role and published material criteria.

Athlete

Sports · Kyrgyzstan

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2024-08-02
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility for extraordinary ability by not meeting at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. Specifically, the AAO withdrew the Director's finding that the judging criterion was met, citing insufficient evidence regarding the nature and level of judging activities. The published material criterion was also not met due to outdated viewership statistics for the media outlet and the author not being identified. The awards criterion was not addressed as it would not change the outcome, and the membership criterion was met but insufficient on its own.

Others

Sports

USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-03-13
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner met zero of the required three criteria. Specifically, evidence for awards (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)) lacked context on significance, and membership evidence (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ii)) failed to prove the 'outstanding achievements' requirement for the National Snowboarding Team. Other claimed criteria (published material and judging) were not reached as the first two were dispositive.

Athlete

Sports · Brazil

USCIS EB-1A rfe dismissed
2025-03-31
The Petitioner failed to respond to specific evidentiary shortcomings identified in an RFE, rendering those arguments procedurally barred on appeal. Substantively, the record lacked evidence of a one-time major achievement or documentation satisfying at least three of the ten EB-1A criteria. The Petitioner did not demonstrate being part of the small percentage at the very top of the field or having a career of acclaimed work.

Frequently Asked Questions

A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.

Browse More Cases

Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-10-29.

Browse all cases

At a Glance

Outcome dismissed
Criteria Met 0 / 3
Evidence Types 4

EB-1A Case Data

Scraped Case Data

Total Cases 881
Success Rate 52.9%
Sustained 466
Dismissed 299

Get Case Insights

Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.

Join Waitlist