dismissed EB-1A
Professor Of Law And Economics
Law And Economics · 2024-11-13
This case is from a USCIS Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) appeal decision. Appeal cases represent a subset of petitions and may not reflect typical outcomes.
Why This Petition Was Denied
The motion to reopen was dismissed because it failed to state new facts supported by documentary evidence, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2). The motion to reconsider was dismissed because it did not establish that the AAO's latest decision misapplied law or policy. Specifically, the Petitioner's reliance on Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo was deemed misplaced, as that ruling applies to federal courts' deference to agency interpretations of statutes, not to agencies' interpretations of their own regulations, which remain subject to Auer deference. Furthermore, alleged factual errors were found to be immaterial to the decision's analysis.
Similar Cases
Professor
Education
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-07-12
The motion to reopen was dismissed because it failed to state new facts supported by documentary evidence, as the evidence provided was already part of the record. The motion to reconsider was dismissed because it did not establish that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. Specifically, the Petitioner failed to meet at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3) and did not demonstrate how STEM policy guidance applied to his role as a professor of law and economics.
Others
Others
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-03-13
The combined motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner did not provide new facts or establish that the previous dismissal was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. Specifically, the Petitioner sent his appeal brief to the wrong location, violating 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(2) and Form I-290B instructions. The Petitioner's resubmission of previously provided information did not meet the requirements for a motion to reopen.
Others
Others
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2024-05-21
The motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed because the Petitioner failed to establish that the prior summary dismissal was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. Although the Petitioner provided a copy of a supplemental brief, it was incorrectly mailed to Arizona instead of the AAO, and the Petitioner offered no new facts to overcome the grounds for the original dismissal.
Lawyer
Legal Services
USCIS EB-1A dismissed
2025-01-10
The appeal was dismissed because the Petitioner's brief only addressed the original petition denial and her eligibility, rather than challenging the Director's most recent decision to dismiss her combined motion to reopen and reconsider. The AAO found that the Petitioner's failure to address why the Director's motion dismissal contained any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact was a sufficient basis for summary dismissal, and by not contesting the motion decision, she abandoned those claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
A dismissed EB-1A petition means USCIS found the evidence insufficient to meet the eligibility criteria. Common reasons include weak documentation, failure to meet the required number of criteria, or insufficient evidence of the claimed qualifications. Petitioners can refile with stronger evidence or explore alternative visa categories.
Browse More Cases
Case data sourced from publicly available petition decisions and case studies. Decision date: 2024-11-13.
Browse all casesAt a Glance
Outcome dismissed
EB-1A Case Data
Scraped Case Data
Total Cases 919
Success Rate 53.0%
Sustained 487
Dismissed 315
Related Pages
Get Case Insights
Compare your profile against thousands of real petition outcomes. Join the waitlist for personalized analysis.
Join Waitlist